Integrating computational methods and survey experiments with sociological theories of evaluation, my research contributes to our understanding of how social biases systematically shape knowledge production and recognition in ways that reproduce existing inequalities. These insights extend beyond academia to provide frameworks for understanding how innovations are evaluated in various domains, including entrepreneurship and cultural fields.
Leahey, Erin, Jina Lee, Russell. J. Funk. (2023). What Types of Novelty Are Most Disruptive? American Sociological Review, 88(3): 562-597.
We found that papers with new methods disrupt existing knowledge patterns the most, typically standing on their own. In contrast, papers introducing new theories tend to enhance and build upon existing knowledge, often being cited along with the works they reference. This study is unique because it goes beyond the usual unidimensional approach of measuring novelty and impact in science. We created a new way to measure the multiple types of novelty in scientific articles and assessed the nature of their scientific influences.
Lee, Jina, Minjae Seo, Erin Leahey. (2022). Who Deserves Protection? How Naming Potential Beneficiaries Influences COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions. Socius, 8, 23780231221082422.
Vaccination serves both personal and community benefits by reducing disease spread. Our experimental study with 516 participants explored the influence of political ideology and vaccination promotion messages on COVID-19 vaccine intent. Results showed liberals responded positively to messages highlighting racial minorities, while conservatives' vaccine intent decreased. Our results indicate the persistent societal exclusion of racial and ethnic minorities from moral boundaries contingent upon political values.
Zhao, Yi, Jina Lee, Cheryl Ellenwood. (2021). The Persistent Influence of Gender Stereotypes in Social Entrepreneurial Financing. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(3): 811-832.
While social enterprises seem promising in promoting female entrepreneurship and gender equality, our research reveals that female social entrepreneurs still face disadvantages in securing funding compared to their male counterparts. Even though these disparities lessen with ventures of greater social value orientation, this is due to reduced funding for male founders, not increased funding for females.
Lee, Jina. “Gendered Pathways to Perpetual Fame: Elite Novelists' Selection into the Korean Literary Canon.” [Minor Revise at Poetics]
Lee, Jina. “The Gender of Scientific Authority: Novelty Claims and Gender Gaps in Scientific Impact Across Disciplines” [Under review]
Paik, Eugene T., Jina Lee, Erin Leahey, Russell Funk. “Divide and Conquer? How Partitioned Audiences Shape the Impact of Domain-Spanning Innovation.” [Under review]
Lee, Jina. “Selective Recognition: Gendered Recognition of Different Types of Scientific Novelty.” [Manuscript available]
Lee, Jina. “Who Faces More Doubt in Crisis? Gendered Patterns of Uncertainty in Reception of High-Stakes Science.” [In progress]
Jeon, Hyejin, Jina Lee, Changdong Oh, Jeong-Han Kang. “Framing the Victim: Understanding the Portrayal of Sex-Based Crimes in South Korean News.” [In progress]
Bratt, Sarah, Erin Leahey, Yea-Eun Kwon, Charles Lassiter, Jina Lee, Charles Gomez. “Do Journal Data Sharing Requirements Promote Humility in Scientific Articles?” [In progress]